![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Let's punish women for suffering!
Apr. 16th, 2010 02:05 pmSiumut member Malik Berthelsen suggests making women pay for abortions.
I am completely shocked that a member of Siumut, a supposedly socialist party, could suggest something so horrible.
If half of pregnancies in Greenland are terminated voluntarily, then there are serious social problems to be dealt with. But we already knew that. So why not try to do something about the rampant mental health problems, substance abuse problems and unemployment problems, rather than punish these women for suffering?
What exactly does Berthelsen think these women would do? What if they don't have DKK 2000 (approximately USD 400)? That's a lot of money for anyone, but especially for someone on public benefits and/or with a substance abuse problem. Are they supposed to give birth, and then neglect the baby? No one chooses to have an abortion for fun! These women have damn good reasons for preferring to go through that traumatic procedure rather than having the baby.
Berthelsen says that the threat of an expensive abortion would encourage people to use birth control. I say that he has a completely messed up view of what women are, and what kind of bodily integrity a woman is entitled to, if he thinks that the threat of going through an abortion is not a huge big deal in itself.
There are reasons for unwanted pregnancies, and those reasons are not typically a careful cost-benefit analysis of the inconvenience of stopping for a few minutes to get a condom versus the inconvenience of getting pregnant or getting an STD.
I am completely shocked that a member of Siumut, a supposedly socialist party, could suggest something so horrible.
If half of pregnancies in Greenland are terminated voluntarily, then there are serious social problems to be dealt with. But we already knew that. So why not try to do something about the rampant mental health problems, substance abuse problems and unemployment problems, rather than punish these women for suffering?
What exactly does Berthelsen think these women would do? What if they don't have DKK 2000 (approximately USD 400)? That's a lot of money for anyone, but especially for someone on public benefits and/or with a substance abuse problem. Are they supposed to give birth, and then neglect the baby? No one chooses to have an abortion for fun! These women have damn good reasons for preferring to go through that traumatic procedure rather than having the baby.
Berthelsen says that the threat of an expensive abortion would encourage people to use birth control. I say that he has a completely messed up view of what women are, and what kind of bodily integrity a woman is entitled to, if he thinks that the threat of going through an abortion is not a huge big deal in itself.
There are reasons for unwanted pregnancies, and those reasons are not typically a careful cost-benefit analysis of the inconvenience of stopping for a few minutes to get a condom versus the inconvenience of getting pregnant or getting an STD.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}