(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-27 07:14 am (UTC)
noracharles: (Default)
From: [personal profile] noracharles
I understand. I agree with your observations about her, like I said. My problems are 1) what function does it serve in the story? it seems gratuitous to me, and 2) the anviliciousness of it.

I know that as an author I tend to err on the side of obscurity, so explaining all the plot points and character development very carefully and several times is a matter of style and taste, and may in fact be something most readers prefer, so it would be fair to disregard point 2).

As for point 1) - maybe bashing is the wrong word? I used to think that "bashing" was only when an author deliberately skewed characterization or even made up things to hate on a character for, but I've been informed that the expression is also used when an author gratuitously focuses on a character's flaws - for example using the epithet "the murdering psychopath" for Spike when it's not relevant to the scene.

So yeah, please take "bashing" with a grain of salt. What I mean is, I think you focus on Willow's flaws to an irrelevant and annoying extent that leaves a bad taste in my mouth, and only for the reason of making Buffy seem not quite as bad in comparison.

Thank you for commenting and calling me on a misleading/confusing description.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

noracharles: (Default)
Nora Charles

October 2018

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags