noracharles: (Default)
[personal profile] noracharles
This is a post about the accessibility of fandom fests for people with social anxieties.

October 24th, 2009: [personal profile] kaz on [community profile] access_fandom: Challenges, challenges, challenges
It's a great post, go read :-)

I would like in particular to quote this:
If you have written anything of the "we will be kind of unhappy if you drop out without a good reason >(" variety, in fact if you haven't explicitly made it clear that dropping out is acceptable, I have probably worked myself up into such a state about this that I cannot, actually, think about the challenge without starting to cry. - [personal profile] kaz
because it is relevant to what I have to say.

Yuletide is moving to a new archive, because the old archive is kaput. Some members for a variety of personal reasons want to withdraw their fics. The move of old fics hasn't even started yet, but speculation and rumors about how it would be handled started as soon as the move was announced.

January 4th 2010: [personal profile] astolat mod of yuletide: About the AO3 and the yuletide move
If you want more details about the move, there will be a detailed explanation including optional tech geekery on the yuletide_admin livejournal at least a week before we actually run the import (the move was delayed until after Yuletide so we could do this in a more sane way), and all authors will be notified at all of the email addresses on their yuletide story or stories, and will have the option to claim, orphan, or delete your work. (I'll field questions on that post, but please hold 'em until then!) - [personal profile] astolat

I like how she makes her position clear, that the move is necessary, but does not lay on the guilt. I have not followed the communications from yuletide regarding the move very closely, because I am not a member, but I have no objections to any of the official communications I have seen. On the contrary, I am pleasantly surprised.

The problem is that supporters of yuletide have taken it upon themselves to wage a campaign of social pressure on members not to remove any fics from the archive.

Please note: This is my, possibly inaccurate, summary. I do not speak for anyone but myself. Please go to the source to form your own impression of what people are really saying.

January 2nd, 2010: [livejournal.com profile] merricatk: Ravings of an emotionally unstable fan. Warning, ableist content in comments, may be triggering.

[livejournal.com profile] merricatk provides us with some background for context: She is a member of yuletide, and wishes to withdraw her fic or at least be better informed about her privacy options. She has a history of not functioning well in fandom social circles, and has accepted that certain things she just can't take part in. For her own health and well-being, she has decided to withdraw her fic from public archives and repost it in her own journal.

Having heard the rumor of yuletide moving, she went looking for information, and supporters of yuletide were calling members wishing to withdraw names. ([livejournal.com profile] merricatk seems to think they are official representatives of yuletide, but from what I have seen that is not the case.)

I wish they weren't using the word orphan. It's too poetic, it puts to sharp a point on the abandonment, it makes me feel terrible. I have abandonment issues. Call me a thief for taking my story back and I can deal with it. Say I'm making my story an orphan, I'll cry.

[...]

I'm perfectly aware that my feelings--and all this is nothing but my feelings--are indefensible. But I don't like it when the powerful people come and tell me how unreasonable I am not to want to do things their way. Not ask, just tell.

I can live with being disliked, considered a screwball, or an angry, shitty, classless, selfish jerkass, and I can live with people believing the lie that I'm doing this because I hate OTW and/or A3O. I can live with the whole rest of the world considering me irrational.


January 3rd, 2010: [journalfen.net profile] fandom_wank: Beat your breasts, maidens, and rend your tunics. Warning, ableist content in post and comments, may be triggering.
fandom_wank users discuss the yuletide archive move debate, including [livejournal.com profile] merricatk's post.

There are many very funny snarky comments, but there are also a few opinions I find objectionable:

  • That [livejournal.com profile] merricatk does not have the right to talk about her anxiety, because the pain she feels is lesser than the pain other people could have potentially felt had other authors agreed with [livejournal.com profile] merricatk in the warnings debate some months ago that writing warnings on all their fic was an insurmountable task and a barrier to future writing inspiration and motivation and had they furthermore disagreed with [livejournal.com profile] merricatk that it was appropriate to take other measures, such as removing their fic from public archives. Or as they say: [livejournal.com profile] merricatk does not feel empathy, so deserves no empathy.


  • That [livejournal.com profile] merricatk does not have the right to talk about her anxiety, because her feelings are stupid and inconvenient.


Dear reader, should [livejournal.com profile] merricatk's opinions on anything influence your opinion on whether supporters of a fest can create an atmosphere which excludes people with social anxieties from taking part in fests?

And, dear reader, if accessibility is only for the good people with disabilities, and [livejournal.com profile] merricatk is a bad person with a disability, does the fact that she used herself as an example of a fan with social anxiety crying over a fest mean that you should not care about the other fans with social anxiety
  • possibly being triggered by the atmosphere of social pressure surrounding the yuletide move
  • possibly being scared away from seeking information from the actual official representatives of the fest
  • and possibly being scared away from ever participating in a fandom fest in the future?

How can we do better?

I think the mods could not have anticipated the way the discussion flared up. I knew from casually looking through the yuletide comm that information about the move was forthcoming, and that the mods were very busy with yuletide 2009 which has only just finished. And I think [personal profile] astolat reacted very quickly, pouring oil on the troubled waters and making it clear that it would be possible to withdraw. I do not blame the yuletide mods in any way.

Future mods of fests could consider having an official policy of asking supporters not to answer member questions, except to refer confused members to the rules or FAQ. This might cut down on supporters going against a fest's policy of non-confrontation and low guilt and anxiety. Enforcing rules without causing anxiety attacks is a very tricky matter, and random supporters should not be encouraged to enforce rules through social pressure.

Supporters of fests, who are understandably eager to have everyone follow the rules, could consider whether referring the confused to the rules or FAQ, or letting them know that an official announcement will be forthcoming wouldn't be the most constructive thing to do.

I can't blame anyone for snarking in a comm like [journalfen.net profile] fandom_wank, because it is not a safe space, and it has rules against confronting the people under discussion. But I think that people who think that an appropriate response to "You are frightening me" is more confrontation, or pointing and laughing, need to examine their ableist privilege.




This is a post about the accessibility of fandom fests for people with social anxieties.

It is not a post about whether there are rules about withdrawing fic from yuletide, whether the rules were made clear when people signed up, and whether the archive move releases users from their promise to leave the fic in the archive.

It is not a post about whether social anxiety is real, and whether social pressure including guilt and name calling can trigger anxiety attacks.

It is not a post about the warnings debate, and [livejournal.com profile] merricatk or [personal profile] noracharles' role in the debate.

You must log in to comment. LiveJournal and most LiveJournal-based sites have OpenID: check the "OpenID" radio button in the comment box, and write in your identity URL in the text box, for example "myusername.livejournal.com". You will be redirected to log in to your own journal site, and with a simple click of a button you can give permission for dreamwidth to display your OpenID username with your comment. It's very simple and requires no set-up or filling out forms of any kind.

I will not be able to moderate any discussion that takes place here continuously. Try to stay on topic, and don't allow the discussion to be derailed.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-04 10:49 pm (UTC)
laughingrat: Ringo holding sign that says "I CARN'T SPEL." (I CARN'T SPEL)
From: [personal profile] laughingrat
if accessibility is only for the good people with disabilities, and merricatk is a bad person with a disability

That was a thread that had been bugging me from when we chatted about this earlier--there was something that had been niggling at me about the response to Merricatk's post that you'd told me about, and then I realized: it's that people only want to make accommodation that don't inconvenience them very much.

I haven't gotten to read all the background yet, and plus I'm not sure that what I'm thinking right now is A: informed, or B: Finished. There's something in this about untenable positions, and the right for groups to set boundaries, and the right of people to ask for accommodations...and then I'm also reminded of the fact that sometimes there are behaviors which someone can't help, but which are incompatible with the needs of the many. These are all real things which can be mutually exclusive. Where that leaves anyone in this situation, I don't know. I should go read more before I say anything else, and plus this was probably too jumbled-up anyhow.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] laughingrat - Date: 2010-01-04 11:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

I guess this is officially off-topic, sorry

From: [personal profile] laughingrat - Date: 2010-01-05 12:50 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: I guess this is officially off-topic, sorry

From: [personal profile] laughingrat - Date: 2010-01-05 01:36 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: I guess this is officially off-topic, sorry

From: [personal profile] carose59 - Date: 2010-01-05 11:30 am (UTC) - Expand

Re: I guess this is officially off-topic, sorry

From: [personal profile] doire - Date: 2010-01-09 02:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

Re: I guess this is officially off-topic, sorry

From: [personal profile] snakeling - Date: 2010-01-09 07:00 pm (UTC) - Expand

(frozen) (no subject)

From: [personal profile] saraht - Date: 2010-01-06 02:11 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] giandujakiss - Date: 2010-01-06 04:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] giandujakiss - Date: 2010-01-06 05:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] giandujakiss - Date: 2010-01-06 05:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-05 05:39 am (UTC)
aquaeri: a pensive shadowy cat (sad)
From: [personal profile] aquaeri
I'm not involved in yuletide fic or any other fic'ing, but I certainly have issues around social pressure to conform, to play along, which would have been set off by this situation. And the fact that I've seen parts of fandom behave in similar ways in other situations in the past is part of why I don't think of myself as fully part of fandom and am reluctant to participate in some places.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] aquaeri - Date: 2010-01-05 09:25 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-05 12:01 pm (UTC)
kaz: "Kaz" written in cursive with a white quill that is dissolving into (badly drawn in Photoshop) butterflies. (Default)
From: [personal profile] kaz
Oh wow, *thank you*. I'd only seen the fringes of this debacle (as you can probably guess from my post, I don't participate in Yuletide and try to ignore the dialogue around it as much as possible so it won't hurt so much), so when you talked about the ableism I went "huhwhat?" and went looking at your journal. I am so glad I did because I had no idea this was going on.

Also:

Or as they say: merricatk does not feel empathy, so deserves no empathy.

This? This is a fucking HORRIBLE thing to say to someone. I am actually sitting here shaking with rage over it. Of course, most people probably don't have my history with having seen claims that they have no empathy used to discount people as monsters, less than human, undeserving of full human rights, again and again and again - most recently against my brother in order to take his daughter away from him which is why I am just a little bit angry here, but this is a common thread throughout autism rights dialogue and probably to a lesser extent talk about neuroatypicality in general. It ties in with the whole "people with mental illnesses are being selfish!" thing which, uh, we see right here. Which is to say, that kind of statement (apart from being, you know, HORRIBLE) is massively, massively loaded in an ableist way.

I. I just. Why.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-05 04:38 pm (UTC)
elf: OTW logo & text (OTW text)
From: [personal profile] elf
I think the mods could not have anticipated the way the discussion flared up.

I don't think they could've anticipated the details of the current discussions, but they could've known (hell, I knew) that the wank would eventually hit, and it would be shaped thusly:

Random anti-OTW: OTW is evil and trying to take over all of fandom by moving Yuletide!
Non-BNF but active fans: OTWho? Yuletide is whatwherenow?
Anti-OTW crowd: THEY'RE STEALING YULETIDE!!!
Non-BNF: What happens to my stories, which were happy on the nice isolated YT archive?
AO3 spokesperson: They'll get moved to shiny new servers and get lots of company.
Non-BNF: What if I don't want company?
Anti-OTW: YUR STORIES WILL BE ASSIMILATED! COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT! PLAGIARISM! OUTINGS AND LAWYERS AND WANKAGE OH MY!
AO3 Spokesperson: You have the option of hiding your identity, or (sigh) removing stories.
AO3 Supporters: Pulling stories is cowardly and shameful and icky and fandom won't like you anymore!
Anti-OTW: See? They've all drunk the kool-aid! Run! Run away fast!
Non-BNF: o.O ???

... and so on, leaving non-BNF confused and scared and annoyed as hell at all these people yelling about something she really doesn't want to deal with and wishes would go away.

Thing is, knowing that was coming ... I'm not sure anything could've been done about it. More public announcements would have invoked *early* wank by the anti-OTW crowd, and if that had hit *before* Yuletide, YT would've been even more troublesome to manage.

(Trying to drag this back to accessibility issues...)

I don't think AO3 could have done any more useful outreach to avoid anxieties; they can't know who's going to be bothered by the move without doing big, loud, prominent announcements--which would just invoke more wank earlier. I don't know that they can do much to mitigate people's worries; YT has to move, and no moving solution is going to work for everyone, for countless individual reasons.

I would like to see those who are upset/unhappy with the move treated with more consideration. I don't think inevitability is an excuse for rudeness, and I don't like the "suck it up" message that's being thrown at some of the objectors.

There's a difference between "we can't make any changes to accommodate your needs/wants" and "you should be happy with what you've got, or at least shut up about it." And I think there's too much of the latter going around.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] kaz - Date: 2010-01-05 11:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-06 12:42 am (UTC)
sheafrotherdon: Two men, seated, leaning in to touch their foreheads together (Default)
From: [personal profile] sheafrotherdon
Thank you for this very thought-provoking essay.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-06 01:08 am (UTC)
anjak_j: Derek Jeter touching the Joe DiMaggio quote sign (Default)
From: [personal profile] anjak_j
Here via [personal profile] sheafrotherdon

I want to say thank you to you for this awesome essay. It's not too often that someone writes about ableist privilege when it comes to mental health.

All I get from the comments by those with privilege in the linked posts is that they're only willing to make accommodations for people to the extent that it doesn't harsh their fandom squee. The minute someone with a social anxiety issue brought on by a fandom fest airs that particular concern, all pretence of decency goes out of the window.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] anjak_j - Date: 2010-01-06 01:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-06 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hebrew-hernia.livejournal.com
Here via [personal profile] sheafrotherdon (and have nooo idea whether that html tag is going to work; apologies if it doesn't).

I have some pretty severe mental health issues and I've found fandom to be a really good way to make social contacts when I'm not otherwise capable of doing so, and to supplement those I have "in real life." As someone with mental health issues, I want to thank you for bringing these links together and bringing these issues into the spotlight so eloquently.

I've definitely found myself grateful not to have participated in yuletide as all of this has started to happen. One of the things that I find to be really difficult is searching out information related to a general topic that has produced wank -- for example, the yuletide move to AO3. I am the non-BNF from elf's comment, with the exception that I haven't participated in yuletide before so this doesn't really affect me except as it relates to my nascent interest in accessibility issues. (I say "nascent" because I've only recently accepted the disability label for myself.)

And this might be out of line because you've frozen the thread, but I just want to say: I also really appreciate what you said to saraht. I really admire and appreciate the way you addressed her comment.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-06 07:11 am (UTC)
sqbr: I lay on the couch, suffering an out of spoons error (spoons)
From: [personal profile] sqbr
I am unfortunately not feeling up to making any intelligent commentary on this post right now, but as a neurotypical disabled person try and keep an eye out for this sort of thing yet totally missed this interpretation of the whole mericatk... thing. *ponders*

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-06 12:44 pm (UTC)
vjs2259: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vjs2259
I have been following this discussion, lurking away, and just wanted to say that I appreciate the topic and this post.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-07 09:59 pm (UTC)
secondsilk: Scott from Strictly Ballroom, caught at the end of the turn, arms raised. (Activist)
From: [personal profile] secondsilk
This is an interesting post and a topic that deserves careful consideration. I have not been following the debate and doing so would probably upset the careful hold I have on my mood at the moment. I hadn't considered the difficultly that I have with fests (Yuletide twice now as well as many others) anything other than my own flakiness and laziness, so knowing that social pressure and guilt are general circumstances that can and do affect others, and are things which mods are aware of and can manage makes me feel a little better, (and a little bit more in need of a sit down deep and meaningful discussion with myself).

(Not that I don't feel a sense of pressure to do Yuletide and to be able to do Yuletide. Likewise Remix (and, differently, NaNo). That I'm not "really" in fandom/contributing to fandom if I don't. That I need a "real" reason to not participate, not just "it makes me anxious, and I'll feel bad when I inevitably fail".)

People can be horrible sometimes and it always kind of amazes me. Especially online where you can reread and edit your comments before you post. But maybe people for whom receiving replies to comments is not an anxiety causing event in and of itself are able to take greater risks/pay less careful attention to what they say and how they say it.

Don't think I haven't re-read this comment and edited it half a dozen times. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-08 08:30 am (UTC)
kiwisue: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kiwisue
Here from [community profile] metafandom's delicious links.

Thank you for the breath of fresh air.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-08 09:45 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] rhoda
What [personal profile] kiwisue said. This post, as well as the comments, have made my day.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-08 08:20 pm (UTC)
wishfulclicking: man in black and white pulling back a curtain to show moving sky (chase internets)
From: [personal profile] wishfulclicking
This is a good post.

I've read both the post on access_fandom and I've followed some of the discussion regarding the AO3 move and Yuletide. I definitely agree that the mods are doing a great job on making it as stress free as possible. If, like you mentioned, it became more of a rule that people with questions were directed to the faq or a mod directly answered their questions, things would probably run smoother.

I've seen fests where guilt was often tossed around and it made me uncomfortable but, thankfully, the challenges I've been involved in have all had excellent mods.

As someone who deals with social anxiety, I've had to adjust how I deal with my internet time, and I haven't always made the right decision at first. Nanowrimo sent me into fits the first year, this year was a bit better, and I had to drop out of two different challenges. It was upsetting for me because I hate not finishing things but the mods were never horrible towards me. (If they had negative feelings about any of it, none of it leaked publicly so I think they did a good job.)

But this is why I avoid exchanges. I get upset enough at just writing fic for challenges, let alone fic for someone else. I wonder how much of the 'energy' surrounding this yuletide stuff is because yuletide is a fan exchange challenge. The whole 'gift' nature of the challenge has been popping up a lot in these discussions.

Running a fest in mind for people with social anxiety isn't catering as much as it is running the best fest possible. Having clear rules, due dates, and not trying to make people feel guilty if they can't produce the fic/art/vid/mix in time. Also, having enough pinch hitters for those people who do produce the fanwork in time, get something in exchange. That's just good modding.


This seems to have run long, but in sum: if someone doesn't feel comfortable with their story being in yuletide, they can orphan or even delete their stories if that's what they want to do. The mods allow it (I think the only repercussion is not being able to participate in yuletide in the following years but if the person is uncomfortable with AO3, I wouldn't see how they would want to anyhow) and it's not the other members of yuletide place to jump on the person.

(I'm not addressing the specifics of merrickat because I didn't read their post because by the time they had posted I was done with reading stuff about AO3/Yuletide unless they were pieces of fiction. I don't know how the flow of information came but I assumed the information about the move was readily available but I follow metafandom closely and I know not everyone does that.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-09 02:32 pm (UTC)
doire: (Default)
From: [personal profile] doire
Here via metafandon, though I have been in the friges of the wank.

I'm anxious about putting my ideas out there. I write posts and then don't hit submit, I leave pages open promising myself that I'll post that comment and fiction stays on my hard drive. (Actually it mostly gets deleted.)

I use Yuletide to make myself post; I make a promise and I will keep it. Thanks to its rules I have three pieces out there, which might not have existed if late defaulting wasn't frowned on.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-09 05:17 pm (UTC)
eggcrack: Icon based on the painting "Kullervon kirous ja sotaanlahto" (Default)
From: [personal profile] eggcrack
As somebody who has issues with sociality and everything that comes with it, I just wanted to say how much I appreciate this post. I was very uncomfortable with the way [personal profile] merricatk was condemned for reacting the way she did (I can understand where she's coming from anxiety-wise, so seeing her mocked for that made me feel unwanted and unwelcome), and I think you did a great job of pointing out just why it was problematic. So thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-09 06:10 pm (UTC)
zana16: The Beatles with text "All you need is love" (Default)
From: [personal profile] zana16
Thank you for this post. You articulated something I couldn't get to gel into coherence, and that furthermore I didn't feel up to posting myself because I don't have the energy to respond to the wank. And perhaps I am projecting my own social anxiety onto you, but from my perspective it is very courageous of you to both post this and continue to engage with those who have differing opinions -- so thank you.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-09 07:16 pm (UTC)
sasha_feather: dolphin and zebra gazing at each other across glass (dolphin and zebra)
From: [personal profile] sasha_feather
This post has been included in a linkspam at [community profile] access_fandom. Thank you!

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-10 09:05 pm (UTC)
linkspam_mod: A metal chain (Default)
From: [personal profile] linkspam_mod
This post has been added to a linkspam round up..

(frozen) (no subject)

Date: 2010-01-12 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] nacbrie
This is a very interesting and clear post. I can't say much about the rabid anti-OTW folk, but to the rabid pro-OTW folk I would ask they bear in mind that many of us are reserving judgment. It's not that we don't appreciate what OTW are doing, but any activity which raises the profile of fandom brings a risk to the whole of fandom. The stakes are potentially huge, and many of the fears are grounded in historical precedent. Some need a little bit more convincing - not from the OTW fans, but from the actions of OTW itself. (More thoughts on my journal, didn't want to clog yours.)

Excellent post, anyhow.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-01-19 10:58 pm (UTC)
pseudo_tsuga: ([Other] dissolving butterfly)
From: [personal profile] pseudo_tsuga
As someone who is just realizing she has anxiety issues and barely starting to deal with it, your comments throughout this whole things have been very helpful. I'm adding you to my reading list, if that's okay. :D